At 23:24 29 July 2007, Airjunkie wrote:
This picture has a comparison grid that seems to
be
accurately placed on the basis that the nose to rear
of canopy and nose to front of canopy dimensions
are
the very closely matched. If that analysis is correct
then the grid shows that the wing of S/N 3 is not
moved forward compared to what we are told is the
prototype
(labelled S/N 2) and the canopy lower rear contour
looks to be cut more angularly.

That's not serial #002, THIS is #002.

Here are some shots of serial #002....

http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/b...r/DSCF0013.jpg
http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/b...r/DSCF0010.jpg
http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/b...r/DSCF0007.jpg

Bill

Bill,

That is what I was trying to make clear - that the
grid picture is mis-identified as S/N 2 whereas it
is actually the prototype.

No need for measurements now - your glider is clearly
the same as the Australian one

John