View Single Post
  #25  
Old October 1st 03, 04:26 PM
Andrew Chaplin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"George R. Gonzalez" wrote in
message news:8XAeb.653512$uu5.106982@sccrnsc04...

Let's not fly totally off the handle here folks!

I'd like to have a clean radio environment too, but this power-line Rf

stuff
may not fly, or may not be a problem, for any one of many reasons:

#1: It's cheap, if you ignore the cost of fitting RF pasthru's to

every
pole transformer.

#2: Will people stick with a service that could very likely be slowed

down
or shut down by any noisy vacuum-cleaner motor in the neighborhood?

#3: Exactly how noisy is it, and is this added noise any worse than

your
typical urban background hash from HV corona, salty insulators,

Harley's,
corona-globes, shavers, light-duimmers, touch-lamps, flourescent tubs,
computer monitors, computer keyboards, christmas lights with flashers

and
dimmers, and whatnot?

Let's get the facts before we go toss mudballs at the FCC building.


Isn't this how some broadband services are distributed in the British
Isles, Finalnd and the Netherlands? How has it worked there? Keith
Willshaw reported that ham ops do not seem to have been adversely
affected. Are they using the same frequency régime?
--
Andrew Chaplin
SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO
(If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.)