Harry K wrote:

Just what 'contribution' did he lay down? There is no new aerodynamic
information there, there is no new info on propulsion systems,
actually I can't think of anything at all that is new to the
industry.

What is new is a clumsy, non-flying machine that looks like it was put
together by some 'inventor' in a garage while ignoring common
engineering practices, mainly KISS. Only a nut case would try to
build something using EIGHT! small engines.

Harry K


Awwww....

So my 1/3 scale Dornier DO-X proves I'm nuts?

Oh.

Ok, I see what you mean...