View Single Post
  #11  
Old October 12th 03, 09:27 PM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(Denyav) wrote in message ...
Not built, not flying, non-existant. NATO research would mean US
research, and we are not giving stealth away. Yet more of your
Ubermench fantasy.


1)Who needs stealth?


Apparently about every major military combat aviation project these
days does. Hence the claims from EADS that Typhoon has some stealthy
qualities, as do the claims from Dassault regarding Rafael, not to
mention the myriad of stealthy UAV's hitting the air these days, or
the plans for both Russian and Chinese advanced aircraft projects to
incoporate as many stealthy features as possible, along with a whole
slew of stealthy warship designs beginning to hit the water of late.
Care to name any advanced combat projects that *don't* incorporate it?

2)You cannot give away anything that does not belong to you.
Stealth is a British and German product and stealth in US is gift of Harold
Macmillan to US.


Yeah, right... care to puchase a bridge in Brooklyn?

Brooks