Mark Hickey wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

Mark Hickey wrote in
m:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

On 7 sep, 07:35, Mark Hickey wrote:
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

On Sep 6, 2:36 pm, Mark Hickey wrote:
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
So far, no one's been able to
show a single quote. I'm guessing you won't do any better
(though you seem to be VERY certain of your position - I'm
not
sure how big a number "umpteum" is, but all you need is one
quote - should be a piece of cake, right?).

Yep

http://www.geocities.com/jacksonthor/lieswmd.html

Is it a reading comprehension problem, or do you think "WMD" is
an acronym that has something to do with flying airplanes into
buildings?

Nope, I read jjust fine.

What WMDs, btw?

The ones that the link you referenced above was talking about
(rather than the 9/11 attack, which is the subject of the
question).

No, it isn't. It's what you're trying to make the question.

Ummm... look above. I am asking for a SINGLE quote to prove your
assertion that Iraq was directly involved in the 9/11 attacks.

Here you go,

If you deny this you're as big an idiot or bigger than Bush

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vefD3WSiis

While I'm sure that virtually everyone in the US watched and was
influenced by an 11 minute interview on Irish television (LOL), you're
only proving my point by not being able to produce a single quote.

C'mon Bertie... it can't be THAT hard to actually type out the actual
WORDS that prove your point, now can it? Even W could do that with
ease. Errrr, if they actually existed. I know you're hoping that we
won't have the time to watch a boring 11 minute interview (I don't) to
see that you're STILL wrong.


Oh, and BTW, how many world leaders are wimpy enough to komplain to the
embassy of a reporter's nation after an interview?

Talk about yer tinpot...





Bertie