"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
...
On Nov 28, 8:40 pm, "Matt W. Barrow"

wrote:
"Tina" wrote in message

...

Matt, you may not understand labor laws very well.

Oh, I suppose having over 1,000 people worl for me last
year, I guess I
understand them well enough.

The US branches of
Honda et al can work at keeping unions out, but they
cannot by dictate
keep them out.

They can refuse to recognize (or whatever the legal term
is) them.

Throughout the previous century politicians have given
more and more
power to unions.

No. In his first year in office, Reagan gave corporations
the wink/nod that government was entering a period of
"malign neglect" that continues to this day. Most changes
in labor law and policy since then have eroded worker
rights. Even Clinton intervened to prevent American pilots
from striking.

As a result an employer cannot ignore a collective
bargaining unit if it has been properly set up. This
includes a vote
by employees. If an employer refuses to negotiate with the
union (and
instead tries to go directly to employees) the union can
seek a court
order to force the employer to comply. Every single labor
law is
stacked in favor of the unions.

Ignorant claptrap.

Remember that the U.S. almost become a
socialist country in the early 1900's and we are still
left with some
of those affects.

"Almost became a socialist country"? Another silly
overstatement. That's like saying that America almost
became a collective farm when hippies started living in
communes.