Thread
:
BA 777 crash at Heathrow
View Single Post
#
74
January 19th 08, 06:26 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]
external usenet poster
Posts: 3,851
BA 777 crash at Heathrow
D Ramapriya wrote in news:2e068488-4d2c-4880-9f7e-
:
On Jan 19, 7:14 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Well, RR engines are crap anyway. I've flown them on two types. They;re
needlessly complicated, labor intensive to maintain and they leak oil
everywhere,including into the cabin.
Bertie, by 'cabin', do you mean the portion of the turbine that houses
the vanes?
No, by "Cabin" I mean the portion of the airplane that the people sit in.
The pressurisation for almost all jets comes form the turbine section.
Several engines, most notoriously, RB211s, leak engine oil into the turbine
section where; it's heated, pyrolised , and then injected in a fine mist
into the cabin where it causes nerve damage to the occupants.
All jet engines do this to some degree or other. RR engines, particularly
the RB211 and particularly the early engines, inject lots and lots of this
into the cabin.
Nice.
www.advisorybodies.doh.gov.uk/pdfs/tox0639.pdf
http://www.aaib.dft.gov.uk/cms_resou...BPEE_07-05.pdf
casa.gov.au/fsa/2002/jul/44-45.pdf
http://www.yarchive.net/air/airliner...ust_fumes.html
It's a huge problem worldwide. It's barely discussed in the US....
The ramifications for the industry if this is ever looked square in the eye
are mindblowing.
Boeing have gone with a seperate blower for the 787 because of this
problem.
Bertie
Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]
Find all threads started by Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]