View Single Post
  #3  
Old January 23rd 08, 04:51 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jules
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 75
Default The 777 crash - another theory

I don't see anything wrong with his posting that link.

If your excuse is, 'his other sins, on other occasions', then you owe
him an apology.

But the article post was appreciated my me, and perhaps, me alone

Which Airbus' do you fly?






Airbus wrote:

In article ,
says...


Don't take it personal, it is sop in this newsgroup to pick away at
people; like crows, with a roadside carcass.




It is SOP to de-mask and challenge lunabics who try to come across as
exferts, when there are knowledgeable people present and ready to answer.
Mxsmanic is the world champion, but the present contributor is no slounch in
the matter.

Perhaps you didn't see his prebious post, in which he suggested the BA crew
should not have executed an emergency evacuation after a crash landing in a
field. He felt it would have been smarter to wait for the air stairs to
arrive and should these not easily get across the drainage ditches, the
best solution would have been ladders, and only after these proved to be
"too short" would deployment of the slides have been advisable.

He proffered ridicule for the brew for having quickly adopted this
solution, when he could have simply asked (because he doesn't know) whether
this was the best choice.

No picking away at carcasses for people who ask questions for things they
don't know about . . .