Good answer Matt. I totally agree.
But please don't bottom post, I don'want to scroll past all the previous
yatter.
--
Hector

"Matt" wrote in message
...
"Alan Minyard" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 17:24:44 +0000 (UTC), "Matt"
wrote:

So, how are are things in Afghanistan?
Much better than they were under the Taliban. And stop top posting,
it is rude.

Al Minyard

For everyone who yells at you and says "Don't top post, it's confusing.",
there's another one who says "Don't bottom post, I don't want to scroll
past
all the previous yatter."

And thank-you, I won a wager that you'd say "Better than they were under
the
Taliban" without offering any kind of supporting evidence or reasoning.
How
many times have you been in Afghanistan? Why are *you* so authoritative on
the subject?

Things are better in Kabul and Khandahar. Elsewhere, they are much worse,
because the US and UK haven't lived up to their promises. There are
children
starving to death there *right now* because our governments bailed on
them.
Personally, I love my country, but I'm ashamed of the actions of it's
government.

Matt