Iraq 'had no weapons of mass destruction'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/cbbcnews/hi/wo...00/3120374.stm
"Iraq destroyed all its weapons of mass destruction 10 years ago, according
to the United Nations' chief weapons inspector"

Blix suspects there are no weapons of mass destruction
Saturday May 24, 2003
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story...962535,00.html

"The chief UN weapons inspector, Hans Blix, said yesterday that he suspected
that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction, He added that "in this
respect" the war might not have been justified."

Blix: No Need For Iraq War
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/...in574110.shtml
Hans Blix said in an interview broadcast Thursday that the U.S.-led
coalition could have avoided going to war with Iraq, but didn't want to.


"You know, in the Middle Ages, when people were convinced there were
witches, they certainly found them." - Hans Blix

"You know, in the Middle East, where people were convinced there were WMDs,
they never found them."
- Oo


"wrann" wrote in message
news:fs_rb.768$6p6.751@okepread03...
...".. what we don't know.." (above) This is exactly why we had to go in;
we didn't know, he wasn't telling (in fact he was being evasive as hell)

Oh so we should invade countrys whose may or may not have WMD but if we
dont know - invade...

Israel the only country in the "middle east" with weapons of mass
destruction - ask them about them see how evasive they are. Also look at how
many UN resolutions they have broken or ignored.

and contrary to your statement, Blix did NOT say Iraq did not have any, he
actually wrote the finding that they were continuing to be evasive in
direct
violation of the UN (that is United Nations).