"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message
om...
Vince Brannigan wrote in message
...
Kevin Brooks wrote:
Vince Brannigan wrote in message
...

Kevin Brooks wrote:

"Leslie Swartz" wrote in message
...


Vince:

- What about the 30 or so 55 gal drums of Lewisite?
- What about the mobile chem labs?
- What about the Rycin?
- What about the Botulinum?
- What about the anthrax cultures?
- What about the residuals at various dumping sites?

How much "evidence of WMD;" or, more to the point, "evidence of WMD
programs" is enough for you?

Steve Swartz


You are forgetting that Vkince and his ilk only consider it a WMD
program if they can point to a physical and truly massive stockpile
of
active agents already in a weaponized state. That approach makes it
so
much easier for them to continue to bash Bush and the US. And BTW:
you
can add the development of the tactical ballistic missiles that
exceeded the range allowed per the resolutions/cease fire agreement
in
your list as well.

I'll take a single solitary weapon ready for use.


Those missiles?

not WMDS

Your definition of WMD's seems to change with the argument; I do
believe you previously asserted that they were not limited to
chem/bio/nuke devices? But now you seem to find the opposing
definition more suitable. How typical; if the facts don't fit the
framework you chose, change the framework, huh?

The missiles that were supposedly over the 'allowed range' are not WMD. Even
BUSH is not stupid enuff to claim that..

( all bs anyway considering Israels Nuclear arsenal and whole range of
'nasties' dont see any weapons inspectors getting in there).