View Single Post
  #5  
Old November 20th 03, 05:59 PM
Mark Irvine
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

mmm, not so sure, the physiology of the human body is such that the brain
needs that blood! While modern G suits help to limit the surge of blood to
the feet they cannot totally stop it. Also the human head head weighs
around 4 - 5 kg. At 9 G the effective weight is 36 - 45 kg. That does not
take into account the additional weight of the helmet. That is some load
through the neck, come to think of it is is like 1/2 of me being on my own
head with no support, ouch...

I still think that the human is the limiting factor.

Mark



wrote in message
...
Modern G-suits allow much higher G-forces, so the pilot should not be the
limiting factor.

"Mark Irvine" wrote in message
news

"Anonymous" wrote in message
...

Hobo wrote in message ...


How indicative of maneaverability are the max G numbers of fighter
aircraft?

Also, most new aircraft have reported max of 9Gs. Why are they all
coming out at this same number?

Modern aircraft are capable of higher G turns; however, in order to
stop the pilots from blacking/redding out and/or dying in their
seat, the computer controlling the fly-by-wire / fly-by-light
systems stops the turns going any higher.

I think

Cheers
Graeme


It could also be because they do not want to release into the public

domain
the exact performance of the aircraft? A few years ago all aircraft

seemed
to be listed as Mach 2.2 at altitude??

Mark