On Fri, 16 May 2008 12:40:08 -0500, Jim Logajan
wrote in :


Gig, you deliberately edited Larry's original sentence from:

"I had no idea airmen operate under a federal implied consent law,"

to:

"I had no idea airmen operate under a federal law."

then had the nerve to falsely attribute the latter sentence to him. Larry
actually had to edit your reply to return the sentence to its original
statement. What's up with that sort of nonsense?

Revealing isn't it? Disappointing too. Not to mention immature,
sophomoric, duplicitous, devious, disingenuous, shifty, sneaky,
underhanded, deceptive, deceitful, sly, dishonest ...

And here I thought no one was paying attention. You've got a sharp
eye, Jim.

I think some folks use Usenet as a tavern. They just don't realize
how transparent they are when inebriated.