From: Michael Williamson PAM
Date: 12/14/2003 5:41 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

Chad Irby wrote:
In article ,
Michael Williamson wrote:


James Hart wrote:


Why not just build a AC-71, would get there quick enough but might have a
bit of a wide loiter area.


Several problems with the C-17,


He said AC-71.

Like SR-71.


My bad- read it wrong. But then where would the "C" in AC-71
come from? (see, I've got an exuse for almost everything...)

Mike

Think of integral calculus where C is a constant that can be any number. In
this case it can be any letter combination?

In that case if they ever make a B-1C you can mess with people and say the C
stands for RD making it a B-1RD.

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired