Yes, should be wrong. If there was anything to it, someone should be
able to find a bit of corroborating evidence.

When someone writes something controversial, you should look to see if
there's anything outside of the author's word to show if there's any
truth to it or not.

In the case of Richard Sale, he has a tendency to rely heavily on
unnamed sources, or isolated quotes from people that may or may not have
anything to do with the event. not many of his stories get that sort of
confirmation, although you see rehashes of his stories among other folks
with aligned agendas.


I respect your opinion even though my own opinion is considerably different.
I think the real architect of everything we saw in Gulf Region since 70s is
Kissinger and let me use a quote from him:
"Covered operations have nothing to do with Evangelism".