In article ,
Fred J. McCall wrote:

No, most of what I've been calling 'misread' is due to you not reading
what is written to you. Have you answered ANY questions put to you
with regard to your claims? Sources for your 'official' numbers?

Your big complaint was that the F-35's numbers were estimated and would
be horribly wrong, but then you took the same source's estimates for the
F-18 as gospel. You tried to claim that the estimated range for the
F-35 was going to be massively off, with no proof other than your own
suspicions, you suggested that someone in the Navy was covering up some
sort of huge miss on the specs.

Why should I bother?

--
cirby at cfl.rr.com

Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.