Chad Irby wrote:

:In article ,
: Fred J. McCall wrote:
:
: No, most of what I've been calling 'misread' is due to you not reading
: what is written to you. Have you answered ANY questions put to you
: with regard to your claims? Sources for your 'official' numbers?
:
:Your big complaint was that the F-35's numbers were estimated and would
:be horribly wrong, but then you took the same source's estimates for the
:F-18 as gospel. You tried to claim that the estimated range for the
:F-35 was going to be massively off, with no proof other than your own
:suspicions, you suggested that someone in the Navy was covering up some
:sort of huge miss on the specs.
:
:Why should I bother?

You shouldn't, until you learn to read and actually take part in a
discussion. Until then, you're just wasting everyone's time.

--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn