Thread: Hyabusa flat 8
View Single Post
  #30  
Old March 6th 09, 09:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt,uk.rec.motorcycles
Peter Dohm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,754
Default Hyabusa flat 8

"TOG@Toil" wrote in message
...
On 6 Mar, 14:15, Mark Olson wrote:
Wicked Uncle Nigel wrote:
You'd need to boost the low and midrange torque to swing a prop, as
props rotate relatively slowly, don't they? I think a 'Busa engine
would last forever is detuned to 130bhp.


Depends on the prop, but I would think that gearing down would be the
way to go.


If you're forced to use a higher-revving engine, yes- but gearboxes
or belts and cogs introduce problems of their own, which is why a
relatively large displacement slow-revving engine (which doesn't need
four valves/cylinder, multiple chain drive cams with cam chain
tensioners, etc.) makes a lot of sense for aircraft.


Which was what I was thinking. I mean, what was max revs for a Merlin?

Googles

Hm. About 3000rpm. Just off tickover for a 'Busa.


Hmm, some more...

By that line of reasoning, turbines should be really problematic.
No wonder FAA requires additional certification for pilots to fly turbine
aircraft.

Peter :-))))