"Smartace11" wrote in message
...
I would suggest you bypass that level of contols and leave it to EEs and
MEs. Aeros generally lack a proper education in physics and mathematics
to
understand nonlinear feedback control systems.

I think after the "law of the wall", while regulatory, turned out to be
dimensionally an equation with no basis in physical reality, we all
lowered
our expectaions as to Aeros to less than what the rest of Engineering
would
expect a college freshman to know.

Brilliant, John, You've probably just written something not even you can
understand.

A freshman physics student can do a dimensional analysis of an equation.
The question becomes, why couldn't an Aero? After all, it was silly to call
the equation a law in the first place and doubly humiliating for it to be
Regulatory.

Thanks to rec.aviation.misc, the law of the wall is dead. All it took was
some old physics professor selling his "reports" on usenet, while being
attacked by the areo mafia. Did you know Boeing reads there? I mean,
within days the "sonic cruiser" became a possibility.

I can hardly wait to share with my ME and EE friends and
especially my lawyer friends who will no doubt want to quote you in their
future endeavors.

You might want to just look up some young physics studet and save yourself
the humiliation.

You sir would be the perfect expert witness as no one would
understand a thing you say.

I am pre-qualified as an expert witness, in California and Washington, WRT
electrical engineering matters.

I won't hesitate to recommend you, especially for
contractor vs government litigation where it is no one's best interests to
deal
with the real issues.

I make plenty of money now, co-operating with the government.

The government didn't have to take the blame for Aero engineering's
deficiencies in basic math and physics.