"Jeb Hoge" wrote in message
om...
(B2431) wrote in message
...
From: Scott Ferrin
Date: 1/3/2004 5:13 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

Explain to us how two aircraft making 26 flights equals a 100% crash
rate.

According to NASA the only 2 HiMATs made are on display in the
Smithsonian.

According to tarver's 100% crash theory the 2 HiMATs would have averaged
13
"crashes" each.

Well, HiMAT did land on skids, and maybe Tarver's definition of
"landing" only involves tires. It was a wicked-looking little thing,
though.

HiMAT also flew on the West Side of the SJV, so the San Gabrials were not at
risk. HiMAT is a nice little to, aerodynamically, but electrically, it was
a dud. What the shuttle crash investigation boads says is true, as many of
NASA's problems are directly tracable to the "inability to attract and
retain EEs".