Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

Mxsmanic wrote:

Explain bizjets.

Why?

Because you said that the faster and more complex an aircraft is, the higher
the accident rate. But the rate for bizjets and larger transport aircraft is
very low, which invalidates your statement.

The discussion was GA spam cans whether you want to admit that or not.

The discussion was piston aircraft, or are you just being your asshole,
grasp at straws, try to turn the discussion from your original statement,
self?

No, I'm exposing the flaws in your arguments. Clearly, the complexity or
speed of an aircraft does not lead to more accidents in itself. Nor does a
combination of complexity, speed, and a piston engine.

Yes, it does, and it has been shown time and time again.

The C210 accident rate was greater than the C182 accident rate which was
greater than the C172 accident rate.

The same occured for all makers and when comparing comperabale aircraft,
such as a C172 to a Warrior, the rates were comperable.

Why don't you compare the cost to insure a Honda Civic to a Mercedes E550?

Surely you are not comparing a Civic to a C172 and a Mercedes to a SR22?

It makes as much sense as comparing a C172 to a SR22.

The comperable Cessna aircraft was the now out of production C210.

snip babble


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.