On Aug 16, 12:59*am, Rex wrote:
Mike.
There are people in the SSA that where presented with the idea of the
Soaring Safety Foundation purchasing 100 FLARM units to rent to all
National Soaring Championship contestants.
This concept worked at the WCG in Australia a few years back for GPS
FRs. *Look how that turned out.
The idea was to plant the seed at contersts and have the contestants
experience and learn what Flarm could do. *Those pilots would take the
experience back to their regions and Flarm would certainly have been
discussed and I believe implemented.

* But the "Supreme Leaders" of the SSA clearly have choosen to wait
for ADS-B.

I know the arguement about how Flarm would not work in the USA because
it would not protect Gliders from the airplane traffic in general.

I maintain that the greatest, threat of midair for gliders are other
gliders. *Yes we have had airplane Vs Glider mid-airs. *In my 28 year
soaring career, *I can mostly recall the mid-air incidents happening
in contest gaggles. *I suppose I can be proven wrong by a statistical
analysis of all glider mid-air incidents. *I do not think I am alone
in my recollection of events driving my impression of risks.

Now here we are. *For some reason the folks at Flarm have decided to
not market the proven design of Flarm, *but instead, *develope the
Power Flarm for the US market. *I think it is going to be great. *But
is shameful that the Soaring Society did not do anything to appeal to
the producers of Flarm, or the SSA membership to demand this
technology be available 4-5 years ago.

I (not so) patiently wait for word that PowerFlarm has shipped. *I
will shamelessly market them as a dealer as I shake my head at what we
could have done sooner.

We should not stand in *the way of the development fof ADS-B, UAT,
ES1090..... but the soaring market is not going to drive that
technology. *I am surprised that the SSA spends a dime to be at the
table.

The SSA needs to finally endorse and promote for technologly that is
already developed.

I suspect the next response wil be that the technology is not
available in the US *so my views are pointless. *My answer to this is
B.S. *as a group the SSA COULD have made Flarm happen but ADS-B was
simply choosen no matter that is was and is decades away from being a
useful reality.

Flame on......

Rex

Maybe I was snoozing when the Flarm for competition proposal described
above was introduced. When was this? As chair of the SSA rules
committee, I admit to not having been made aware of this proposal.
In any case, my PERSONAL view (not speaking for Rules committee) is
that the mid air collision risk that most threatens us all is not the
glider to glider collision risk, scary as that is, but the risk that
one of our gliders is going to knock a jet out of the sky(that is what
will be described in the news notwithstanding who hit who).
Given my perspective, the coming Power Flarm device offers, from what
I read, a significant group of potential benefits not currently
available to us, once it is commercial and we can put them in gliders.
Hopefully that will be sooner than later.
FWIW- another opinion.