LOL at Tarver!!! Read what Fred is saying for crying out loud! You
guys are going back and forth like a coupla kids!
Nice to see I'm not the only one that sees some loss of comprehension
on his part!

On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:28:42 GMT, Fred J. McCall
wrote:

"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

:
:"Fred J. McCall" wrote in message
. ..
: "Tarver Engineering" wrote:
:
: :"Fred J. McCall" wrote in message
: :news : : "Tarver Engineering" wrote:
: :
: : :
: : :"Fred J. McCall" wrote in message
: : .. .
: : : "Tarver Engineering" wrote:
: : :
: : : :
: : : :"John R Weiss" wrote in message
: : : :news:ZHsYb.331816$I06.3436307@attbi_s01...
: : : : "Tarver Engineering" wrote...
: : : :
: : : :
: : : : When is the CinC not Military?
: : : :
: : : : If "CinC" means "Commander in Chief", then when he's the
:President of the United
: : : : States.
: : : :
: : : : If you mean something else in context, please define CinC.
: : : :
: : : :I am refering to the Constitutional authority delegated to the
:President.
: : :
: : : Which does not make him 'military' any more than the Secretary of
: : : Defense is 'military' or the Secretary of the Navy is 'a sailor'.
: : :
: : :The DoD is delegated Congressional authority and extra Constitutional
:in
: : :nature.
: :
: : False.
: :
: :Show me the DoD in the constitution.
:
: Show me Tarver in the Constitution. That's doesn't make you "extra
: Constitutional in nature".
:
: See Article II, Section 2.
:
:Article II Section 2 proves my contention, but has zero to do with what you
:wrote, Fred.

Work on that reading comprehension, Tarver.