Thread: FLARM for SAR
View Single Post
  #14  
Old November 17th 12, 11:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Don Johnstone[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 398
Default FLARM for SAR

At 08:59 17 November 2012, wrote:
On Saturday, November 17, 2012 6:38:38 AM UTC+1, FLARM wrote:
What you are suggesting is that when an aircraft is missing, anyone

shoul=
d be able to fire up their own homebuilt LFLA analysis tool with whatever
d=
ata they have, then call SAR authorities to give them directions?=20
=20
They would file that call with the calls from fortune-tellers and other

n=
utters.

How sad you don't answer any of my questions. All this new post does is
rep=
eat how stupid the rest of the world must be compared to you, that nobody
e=
lse will ever be clever enough to analyse LFLA as good as you do. That's
no=
t a good starting point for a serious discussion.

Why don't you publish your analysis tool under a free license? That not
onl=
y allows authorities to respond faster to urgent situations without

having
=
to wait for you to wake up, but will also allow others to improve it,
inste=
ad of starting from scratch. You do want to improve response times and

SAR
=
quality, don't you?


Because they are Swiss, they hide things like terrorists bank accounts and
such. It would also appear they hide information which could save a life as
well, why am I not surprised.