View Single Post
  #68  
Old April 6th 04, 07:53 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Harry Andreas" wrote in message
...
In article , John Cook
wrote:

So the processors are obsolete, (too old)... the Avionic architecture
needs to be replaced before the F-22 can become the F/A-22 because

the
present system is based on the old processors and rewriting the code
is pointless on an obsolete system, that would only support half of
the F-22 fleet


does have form, fit, and function upgradeability.
The real issue under these conditions is software portability.


The software will not be portable, as timing issues will make that
impossible.

The F-22 is under enormous pressure to perform right now, with the
review reporting back in the next few months, any talk of obsolete
systems in the state of the art jet are being downplayed.


Upgrading obsolete parts was also a concern from Day 1. It was
expected and planned for: it was one of the drivers for this
implementation of the Pave Pace architecture.


snip

Why is the Raptors Software so troubled?.

You are asking me to pubically bash my customer.


The GAO has already injected reality, but you should hush, Harry. If you
bash the customer you are a bad guy, but if you continue down a road of
telling what you know is subjective spin you will be unethical; the former
is at least a recoverable fault.