"George Z. Bush" wrote in message ...
"WalterM140" wrote in message
...
Ditto on weapons of mass destruction supposedly held by Saddam.

When the head of the CIA says its a "slam dunk" case, who should argue with
him?

Please point us to some documentation that head of the CIA says its
a "slam dunk" case.

That's what Woodward's book "Plan of Attack" says.

That's not all. Here are a few more links that prove the point:

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/...woodward.book/
http://www.antiwar.com/orig/prather.php?articleid=2383
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38198
http://www.wnd.com/news/printer-frie...TICLE_ID=38198
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1124110/posts


Those all refer back to Woodward's book "Plan of Attack". In fact
most of those are copies of the same article published on multiple
web pages.


There's a lot more but that ought to prove that an awful lot of people heard and
reported the statement.

There is NOTHING in there to indicate that anyone other than Bush
and Tenet allegedly heard or reported the statement. McLaughlin
hould have heard it, has he said he did? Woodwards says he interviewed
75 people, he does not say that 75 people confirmed the statement.
Tenet has covered for Bush befor.

Tenet has covered for Bush befor.

No one has ever shown any hard evidence that the US intelligence
abotu WMDs in Iraq was substantively in error. It has only been
shown that the public statements were contrary to fact.

If anyone needs an audio tape of the statement, they
can probably find one somewhere in Google if it's worth the effort.

But could you authenticate it?

--

FF