WalterM140 wrote:

Because Bufdrvr is in a dream world of slaveish devotion to Bush and his
agenda.

You fool, I'm not a member, nor will I ever be, of any political party. I tend
to vote Republican in presidential elections, but I have voted democrat for the
Senate seats in my home state of record. You, on the other hand, are a blinded,
partisan fool who blames Bush for every action taken by the military while
excusing Clinton and blaming Bush ("the elder") for Somalia. You're an idiot
that's trying to have things both ways.

Go away troll.

If he's a detainee, he certainly is.

According to the Genevea Convention, he certainly is.


A Saudi shooting an AK-47 at U.S. military troops in Iraq is an unlawful
combatant with no protection under the Geneva Convention. And you wonder why I
doubt your military service?

Then why did Rumsfeld --say-- they were being treated in accordance with
the
Geneva Conventions?

Good point.

Because official U.S. policy is to treat all captured personnel in accordance
with the Geneva Convention. Because we choose to do that, does not mean they
are granted automatic status under Geneva.


BUFDRVR

"Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips
everyone on Bear Creek"