View Single Post
  #11  
Old November 27th 03, 05:39 AM
sleepy6
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
says...

For those who have been following the conn case. Here's the latest fro
m the
court concerning the case. It says what I've been saying all along tha
t I was
not responsible personally for conns deposit to the old company. Just
more
"proof positive" that zoom and jaun are not credible sources of info.
conn has
14 days to respond so I'm just gonna cool my heels and eat turkey and
drink a
little ML. I'll post any new news.

Still putting my ducks in a row.

See ya

Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret

"credibility it was always about credibility" chuck s



That should shut 'em up for a while. Happy Thanksgiving Chuck.