I have heard of charter passengers, especially ones with corporate aviation
departments, be unwilling to fly in non turbine aircraft.

I do not know what percentage of the market this would represent though.

IMO, the big difference in safety records reflects the amount of money spent
on training more than the reliability of the engines, but when did the
insurance guys really try to figure anything out for real?



"Vigo" wrote in message
...

"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...
The market varies considerably from one place to another. To be blunt,
yours
is much too complex a question to be answered on a news group. I would
want
to see a proper business plan with market surveys and at least a ten
year
budget with supportable income and expense figures.

I will say that Cessna twins are said to be pretty good aircraft,
reliable
and relatively easy to maintain, and that you may have some
misunderstanding
about their 'problems.'

I'm not looking for a complex answer to my question. more a general
outlook
on the piston twin market. I'm mainly curious to know if any current
piston
twin owners have begun to have problems selling their services. I have
been
told that some companies are demanding turbines.