"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:
"Mike Marron" wrote:

And you're just bein' Stevie. A transponder would not have been
required on the replica REGARDLESS of the type of airspace they
were in (see FAR 91.215).

If you actually read FAR 91.215 you'll see there is no exception for replica
aircraft.

As usual, you're talking out your ass again, Stevie. A transponder
is not required on the replica because the replica wasn't certificated
with an engine-driven electrical system. In the future, please don't
attempt to read the FARS unless you have a CFI like myself nearby
or some other knowledgable person who can explain this stuff to ya,
OK?