![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jay Honeck" writes:
I have that in my Aircoupe. The LCD display is splotchy, the buttons are unreliable, a real piece of junk. It has less functions than a $10 Westbend timer and costs 10 times as much. That's odd. The one in my Warrior was beautiful, easy to read, and the buttons worked really well. I stand corrected. I have an Astrotech, truly a mediocre product grossly overpriced at $112 from Chief. |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jay Honeck wrote:
The old wind-up clock in my Pathfinder has become sporadic at best. When it was below zero here, it didn't work at all. Any recommendations on a replacement? Get it cleaned. My Swiss Wittnauer just stopped working last week. Its a classic, top quality windup that has been in my C-170 for 50? years. I thought about replacing it with one of the more accurate, cheaper, more reliable, less susceptible to heat and cold but otherwise tasteless electronic varieties...I just couldn't do it. I removed it and took it to my local (somewhat crusty) local Czech watchmaker who immediately berated me since it hadn't been cleaned since 1983. I got the lecture about how even top quality watch oils will evaporate over time and gum things up. When I went to pick it up, he hesitated giving it to me after I had paid for it. More lecture...did I know how bad heat and cold were on such a precision instrument, etc, etc. He wanted me to promise to remove it if I wasn't going to be flying for more than a week. I said I'd see what I could do. In any case, it sure looks better than some cheesy electronic thing even if it has its drawbacks. If it works for another 20 years before needing another cleaning, I will be happy. Pete Anchorage -- Peter D. Brown http://home.gci.net/~pdb/ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/akmtnsoaring/ |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jay Masino wrote: I think the clock that is most complained about on the group (over the past 10 years, atleast) is the AstroTech LC2. I don't think the Davtron is as problematic. That said, I've had the Astrotech for atleast 8 or 9 years and it's been OK. My airplane had one of these when I bought it. The buttons worked intermittently, and the display was weak and would fade away if the humidity was high. Occasionally the oscillator would stop and the date/time would fall behind by several days. Replacing the battery didn't help. I thought I'd junk it, but decided to try and fix it first. Originally, it ran off a single AAA battery (1.5v) I tried adding a second AAA in series... Wow! The increased voltage (3v) totally transformed the thing. The display was now crisp and sharp, it now kept good time, and the buttons now worked reliably. I think if I used it in IFR a lot, the buttons may not hold up, but when I was flying IFR I used a stop watch. I used mine a lot in IFR. The buttons themselves never had a problem, but I ended up pushing the "start" button firmly so many times that the plastic frontpiece finally cracked around a panel mount nut, so that the clock was only held in the panel by one screw (the panel cutout was only drilled with two mounting holes.) I replaced the nut and added a washer to distribute the "button-pushing" stresses better; no problems since. I probably wouldn't buy another, but if anyone has an Astro-tech clock with problems (and doesn't mind some soldering and a bit of mechanical engineering), adding a second battery helps. Mark/C182L |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Mark Mallory wrote: Originally, it ran off a single AAA battery (1.5v) I tried adding a second AAA in series... Wow! The increased voltage (3v) totally transformed the thing. The display was now crisp and sharp, it now kept good time, and the buttons now worked reliably. Maybe it was designed to run off of a ~3.2V lithium cell? -- Ben Jackson http://www.ben.com/ |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
The clock in my Baron yoke is old, scratched, and otherwise doesn't match
the new interior. The only one available that might fit is a Davtron, which is not approved by STC. Therefore, it sounds like I need a 337 and a field approval to install this clock. Has anyone had a similar experience? It seems like a lot of hassle for just a clock, although it is a permanent installation, etc. Any suggestions? |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Viperdoc wrote: The clock in my Baron yoke is old, scratched, and otherwise doesn't match the new interior. The only one available that might fit is a Davtron, which is not approved by STC. Therefore, it sounds like I need a 337 and a field approval to install this clock. Has anyone had a similar experience? It seems like a lot of hassle for just a clock, although it is a permanent installation, etc. I bought my aircraft without a clock and wound up installing one that was not listed on the OEL. Since it ties into the aircraft power system, the local FSDO wanted a statement of the voltage required and proof that it was manufactured for use in an aircraft. I had to call the manufacturer to get the voltage and write up a statement myself describing the conversation. The box in which the clock came, the receipt, and a page from the Chief Aircraft catalog was accepted as proof that it was, in fact, aviation equipment. I installed the clock under supervision and my IA took care of the 337 and arranged for a field inspection to be performed. The installation, paperwork, and inspection was all done at annual inspection time. Teterboro FSDO. George Patterson A diplomat is a person who can tell you to go to hell in such a way that you look forward to the trip. |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
"G.R. Patterson III" writes:
Viperdoc wrote: The clock in my Baron yoke is old, scratched, and otherwise doesn't match the new interior. The only one available that might fit is a Davtron, which is not approved by STC. Therefore, it sounds like I need a 337 and a field approval to install this clock. Has anyone had a similar experience? It seems like a lot of hassle for just a clock, although it is a permanent installation, etc. I bought my aircraft without a clock and wound up installing one that was not listed on the OEL. Since it ties into the aircraft power system, the local FSDO wanted a statement of the voltage required and proof that it was manufactured for use in an aircraft. I had to call the manufacturer to get the voltage and write up a statement myself describing the conversation. The box in which the clock came, the receipt, and a page from the Chief Aircraft catalog was accepted as proof that it was, in fact, aviation equipment. I installed the clock under supervision and my IA took care of the 337 and arranged for a field inspection to be performed. The installation, paperwork, and inspection was all done at annual inspection time. A 337? For a friggin' clock? Oh never mind, these people love paperwork. Carry on, private, carry on. -jav |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Looking for Mitchell clock with ELT | Rob Turk | Home Built | 0 | June 16th 04 10:03 PM |
| Daytron clock? | Hankal | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | May 24th 04 01:55 AM |
| Alternative for Mitchell quartz clock w. ELT hands | Rob Turk | Home Built | 0 | March 1st 04 11:23 AM |
| Learjet Wall Clock | Gene Seibel | General Aviation | 0 | January 27th 04 05:33 AM |
| Air Force Learjet Wall Clock | Gene Seibel | Military Aviation | 0 | January 27th 04 05:32 AM |