![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
In article , RobertR237 says... You are wasting your time trying to reason with Jaun, he is a self proclaimed expert in all things and nothing will ever change his mind. Boy you got that right ,it didn't take jaun long to start ragging on people over material for a building. I guess a cement BD-5 will fly as good as his perpetual BD-5 project LOL!! Flame shorts on !! See ya Chuck (the guy that designed wood is a pretty good designer) S Yes, wood is the original composite material. Matt |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
geo wrote:
"Vaughn" wrote in message ... Wood is an amazing building material. A properly designed wooden structure will stand up to a hurricane just as well as a properly designed concrete structure. I'm not talking about cinder blocks. Reinforced concrete is by FAR the strongest building material generally available and in the shape of a dome it's much stronger still. Given the same forces a stick home will be a pile of splinters while the dome is unscathed. The numbers have been done; it's not a mystery. http://www.monolithic.com/plan_desig...ive/index.html Define strongest? Tensile strength? Compressive strength? Stiffness? Matt |
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
The concrete homes are cooler also...
Until they get warmed up and then they stay hotter. Its called thermal mass. |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
DBlumel wrote:
The concrete homes are cooler also... Until they get warmed up and then they stay hotter. Its called thermal mass. Yes, and it works both ways. Keeps cool longer once cooled, but also keeps hot longer once heated. Matt |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 17:01:18 -0400, Matt Whiting
wrote: No, concrete designed to withstand hurricans beats wood that wasn't so designed. The old wood sailing ships took a lot more beating on a daily basis than is dished out by a hurricane. And they held up rather well. It is a matter of what loads the structure is designed for, not the materials used in the construction. Matt Matt, this sounds a like hyperbole. "Old wood sailing ships took a lot more beating on a daily basis than is dished out by a hurricane"? Really? Catagory 1 storms begin at 74 miles per hour. Have you ever been in deepwater in a wooden sailing ship when it was blowing at only 74 mph? Because that's the lowest windspeed of the least violent classification of hurricane. I've been on a fiberglass sloop on a large lake when it was blowing steady at 30 knots and gusting to 50 knots. I don't ever want to do that again, and I for SURE would not want to be out at sea in a wooden sailing vessel while a category anything hurricane was blowing. Those old wooden ships demasted on a regular basis and the sea bottom is littered with their wrecks. Corky Scott |
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Vaughn" wrote in message
... And I am not talking about reinforced concrete dome houses. I am talking about the real-life code-compliant housing that fills up neighborhoods here in south Florida. In fact, my post above was not even in response to you, and certainly not to some weird structure that lives in your imagination or on a on a web page somewhere. You don't know what you're talking about. Those weird structures have been built for the last 25 years throughout the world as homes, gyms, auditoriums, churches, bunkers, storage silos, airplane hangers. They can and have withstood most natural disasters including hurricanes, fire, earthquakes and tornadoes. And they're 50%-70% more energy efficient. Given similar costs why anyone would choose to build a flimsy stick and tar stylish deathtrap is beyond me. Last time I checked; here in south Florida, a code-compliant wooden house will get the same insurance rate for storm coverage as a comparable concrete home. Proper storm shutters and/or Dade approved window and door systems are a major item and insurance companies may someday force 100% retrofit in storm counties. After window protection, the next most important item for storm resistance is roof design, not the building material of the walls. Ten years ago, I toured hurricane Andrew's devastation and saw many failed structures, wood, concrete block, and yes; even reinforced concrete. And I'm sure many of them were code-compliant. That's a false sense of security. When a cat-5 hits a code compliant house it'll be in splinters. Code-compliant doesn't mean that's the best that's possible it represents somebody's idea of what can reasonably be done for the least cost given commonly used building techniques without upsetting too many people while making contractors happy. All those planes (not to mention people) that were damaged or destroyed would have been untouched in a monolithic dome. It's that simple. Vaughn (a guy who lives in a concrete house) What kind of concrete house? |
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
Vaughn (a guy who lives in a concrete house)
What kind of concrete house? I guess people who live in concrete houses can throw stones. |
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
Corky Scott wrote:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 17:01:18 -0400, Matt Whiting wrote: No, concrete designed to withstand hurricans beats wood that wasn't so designed. The old wood sailing ships took a lot more beating on a daily basis than is dished out by a hurricane. And they held up rather well. It is a matter of what loads the structure is designed for, not the materials used in the construction. Matt Matt, this sounds a like hyperbole. "Old wood sailing ships took a lot more beating on a daily basis than is dished out by a hurricane"? Really? Catagory 1 storms begin at 74 miles per hour. Have you ever been in deepwater in a wooden sailing ship when it was blowing at only 74 mph? Because that's the lowest windspeed of the least violent classification of hurricane. I was talking about the hull hitting the ways. Hitting a wave at 15-20 knots is a LOT of force. I'd have to do some research to find the equivalent wind speed to provide the same force as hitting water at 20 knots, but it would be a lot of wind given the density difference between wind and water. I've been on a fiberglass sloop on a large lake when it was blowing steady at 30 knots and gusting to 50 knots. I don't ever want to do that again, and I for SURE would not want to be out at sea in a wooden sailing vessel while a category anything hurricane was blowing. Those old wooden ships demasted on a regular basis and the sea bottom is littered with their wrecks. Again, I was talking hull, not masts, sails, etc. Matt |
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
|
"geo" wrote in message news:VUKUc.46144$US4.22088@trndny01... "Vaughn" wrote in message ... And I am not talking about reinforced concrete dome houses. I am talking about the real-life code-compliant housing that fills up neighborhoods here in south Florida. In fact, my post above was not even in response to you, and certainly not to some weird structure that lives in your imagination or on a on a web page somewhere. You don't know what you're talking about. I know exactly what I am talking about and I think I made myself quite clear. Apparently my reality does not match your reality, so this will serve as a friendly end our conversation. You may now withdraw to your dome-shaped hanger with my complements. Regards, Vaughn |
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
|
Matt Whiting wrote:
Corky Scott wrote: On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 17:01:18 -0400, Matt Whiting wrote: No, concrete designed to withstand hurricans beats wood that wasn't so designed. The old wood sailing ships took a lot more beating on a daily basis than is dished out by a hurricane. And they held up rather well. It is a matter of what loads the structure is designed for, not the materials used in the construction. Matt Matt, this sounds a like hyperbole. "Old wood sailing ships took a lot more beating on a daily basis than is dished out by a hurricane"? Really? Catagory 1 storms begin at 74 miles per hour. Have you ever been in deepwater in a wooden sailing ship when it was blowing at only 74 mph? Because that's the lowest windspeed of the least violent classification of hurricane. I was talking about the hull hitting the ways. Hitting a wave at 15-20 I meant to type waves, not ways! Matt |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Hurricane Charlie and Lakeland | Orval Fairbairn | Home Built | 12 | August 17th 04 03:42 PM |