A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Jim Stephenson talking about Sport Pilot Blitz



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old February 26th 05, 02:30 AM
Mark Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Richard Riley wrote:

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:41:35 -0600, Mark Smith
wrote:


:You can't train in experimental homebuilt, you knew this I'm sure

Sure you can. Go read the link, that's why I included it. You can't
give students their primary training in one, you have to be a CFI, you
have to be a member of EAA. You want to give students a multi engine
or seaplane rating? Not a problem. You want to transition them into
something like a Quicksilver, that flies much more on rudder than
ailerons? Not a problem.

Read this one:
http://www.avweb.com/news/homeblts/182021-1.html

Of course, if you're NOT a CFI and you want to train ab-initio
students, then sadly in 5 years you won't be able to.

Me, I think that's a small price to pay for 1) keeping the original
103 structure and 2) getting a whole new class of aircraft with
achievable certification requirements and 3) getting a new class of
pilot's privileges that you can self certify medicals for.


For the most part, private pilots think they already know how to fly
ultralights.

And for the most part, they have proven themselves wrong for over twenty
years.

A PPL isn't Gods gift to the world of flying, it is more paperwork than
flying. that's why they are called pilots not flyers !

And most of the folks who show up at my field to learn to fly uls don't
have a PPL so basic training is out. And you DID know that ! At least
from your rant it seems like you say that somehwre. With all the hoopla
you confused the issue from me using my plane to teach folks to fly.

I could continue to give thousands to an Org that screwed me, but i
choose to NOT do that. I could continue as a BFI for some few years. I
Choose to not do that.

I've taught my share of students as I felt I owed the sport the safety
afforded by having training available. the FnAA has seen fit to
dismantle this time tested and proven system overnight.

I really don't even refer to flying uls as a sport anymore due to the
use of the word sport. Just as Osh Kosh will always be called Osh Kosh
to me, and never aer venture, ever. Course i quit going there many years
ago after getting sick on the food, prices, lack of showers, etc.

I don't want to be a CFI, even if they drove to my house and gave me the
cert. I've seen how their system works, or doesn't as the case may be,
and don't want to be any part of it.



--
Mark Smith
Tri-State Kite Sales
1121 N Locust St
Mt Vernon, IN 47620
1-812-838-6351
http://www.trikite.com

  #32  
Old February 26th 05, 02:58 AM
UltraJohn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mark Smith wrote:

Richard Riley wrote:

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:41:35 -0600, Mark Smith
wrote:


:You can't train in experimental homebuilt, you knew this I'm sure

Sure you can. Go read the link, that's why I included it. You can't
give students their primary training in one, you have to be a CFI, you
have to be a member of EAA. You want to give students a multi engine
or seaplane rating? Not a problem. You want to transition them into
something like a Quicksilver, that flies much more on rudder than
ailerons? Not a problem.

Read this one:
http://www.avweb.com/news/homeblts/182021-1.html

Of course, if you're NOT a CFI and you want to train ab-initio
students, then sadly in 5 years you won't be able to.

Me, I think that's a small price to pay for 1) keeping the original
103 structure and 2) getting a whole new class of aircraft with
achievable certification requirements and 3) getting a new class of
pilot's privileges that you can self certify medicals for.


For the most part, private pilots think they already know how to fly
ultralights.

And for the most part, they have proven themselves wrong for over twenty
years.

A PPL isn't Gods gift to the world of flying, it is more paperwork than
flying. that's why they are called pilots not flyers !

Talk about someone being stuck on themselves, and you think your Gods gift
to flying.
I very definely disagree with your assessment of PPL, Do you really think I
spent 60 hours flying in airplanes just riding around doing nothing?
It's about time you got a life! I'm sure you think since your so heavy into
UL's that you can just hop in a plane and fly it also.
Mark your posting this to RAH (along with RAU) the majority of the people on
this board are pilots flying airplanes. How bout giving a little respect
instead of demeaning others because of your loss of business!
John

  #33  
Old February 26th 05, 03:47 AM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"UltraJohn" wrote

Mark your posting this to RAH (along with RAU) the majority of the people

on
this board are pilots flying airplanes. How bout giving a little respect
instead of demeaning others because of your loss of business!
John


He doesn't matter to me anymore, and he won't bother me anymore. Bye,
Mark. plonk
--
Jim in NC


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Self fly hire in the US Nigel Piloting 25 March 28th 04 09:20 AM
Sport Pilot Seminar & Fly-in Gilan Home Built 0 October 11th 03 05:21 AM
Effect of Light Sport on General Aviation Gilan Home Built 17 September 24th 03 06:11 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.