![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#111
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 2007-11-27 21:48:35 -0800, "Morgans" said:
"C J Campbell" wrote There are no new pilots without flight instructors. But airlines are grabbing flight instructors before they have been working for two years, so the pool of flight instructors is shrinking very rapidly. It has become so bad that places like Embry-Riddle have been offering huge incentives for instructors to stay beyond their 600 hour commitment. Those who are willing to stay are given a salary of $42,000 a year plus a full benefits package. Although this sounds like a big improvement, and it probably is, the sad thing is that 42 thou. is what they should have been making, in the first place. I know, supply demand, yada, yada, yada... All I am saying is that this amount of pay should be expected for a person doing a demanding, highly skilled job, and to have enough money to have a family and a nice house, and a decent standard of living. Even then, it sure is not going to be a luxurious standard of living, at that pay level. It all boils down to the fact that flying is such a cool job for so many people, that they are willing to work for lower pay, just to do the job. Can't argue with you there. At least, people should be paying *me* a lot more than they do. :-) -- Waddling Eagle World Famous Flight Instructor |
|
#112
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Nov 27, 9:47 pm, "Maxwell" wrote:
"Matt W. Barrow" wrote in ... "Bob Noel" wrote in message ... In article , "F. Baum" wrote: On Nov 27, 8:43 am, "Robert M. Gary" wrote: Many of us have a great successful career without every being a member of a union. In fact, most Americans are not union members. In fact, the top paying jobs in the U.S. are non-union. So I think your point is countered. Robert, you rascal ! I love your simplistic answers. Lets take a look at things that didnt exist before organized labor; Child labor laws, healt care benifits, 40 Hour work weeks, severance, paid vacation, benifits packages, retirement, DC plans,overtime and the list goes on................ If you had a great career with any of these benies you can thank organized labor ![]() FB You are assuming that these "benies" exist because of organized labor. Question: what laws would continue to exist if unions went away and what laws would go away? And which would have evolved naturally with increased productivity and increased expertise in management (that had been going on for a couple hundred years). That's out of Baum's mental grasp, unfortunately. -- Funny thing is, you are all right. Everything mentioned here both pro and con has contributed to the wages paid in this country today for most every job. Child labor laws, health care benefits, 40 Hour work weeks, severance, paid vacation, benefits packages, retirement, overtime pay, minimum wage, etc, etc. It's all had a balancing effect on the wages we all draw every day. Without unions we would all be working for less, no matter what our profession. None of my people are under a collective bargaining agreement. There are business reasons to provide compensation packages that are attractive to gain and retain employees. There are business reasons to maintain productivity. However, there is not one person here would believes his job would be subsidized if we no longer had customers. If anyones (including my) position no longer makes business sense it will be elimiated. That's what makes an economy efficient and maximizes return to investors. If you don't like it you should work for the gov't. -Robert |
|
#113
|
|||
|
|||
|
Without a doubt there are some people 'on the street' who can be
trained as pilots, but the prudent move would be to choose candidates from an enriched population. Of course it means there are some really potentially good candidates who would therefore not get selected, but the wise manager will do everything she can to choose well. Interviewing a thousand off the street to find a 'keeper' is a lot less efficient than choosing someone from a target rich environment. This is not theory, but real life stuff. |
|
#114
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:42:55 -0700, "Matt W. Barrow"
wrote: What is it that you like about it? Lots! IN no particular order... The beach, on the Atlantic Ocean, including the 4WD drivable portion on Cape Cod Tibetan food Falafel Awesome pizza on every street corner Broadway & Times Square The New York Rangers, playing in MSG. Radio City Music and Carnegie Hall Italian food near the real Old North Church Killer Museums, EVERYWHERE! Fenway Park Yankee Stadium The bicycling, on and off-road Vermont and New Hampshire, especially Tuckerman's Ravine on Mt. Washington Block Island, Nantucket, Martha's Vineyard, and Provincetown Whale Watching Kayaking the hundreds of lakes and rivers Lincoln Center Killer fine woodworking resources Antiques, including entire homes and mansions Greenwich Village @ 2 AM The Pattagunks and NY's Southern Tier The Adirondacks Direct to most anywhere in Europe, Asia, or North America, from JFK Newport Tall Ships Boston Pops on July 4th Tanglewood all summer 90F summer and 0F winter days No earthquakes, tornadoes, volcanos, and weak hurricanes. The Yale Art Gallery's non-public furniture collection Toad's Place CBGB (RIP!) Bike New York Our neighborhoods don't look like the rest of the country, no "pool sized" back yards and concrete block walls A "big" development has 25-35 homes. G I'm tired of typing... A $45/mo. tie down at a non-towered field with a nicely maintained, 5000x100 ft., 250 MSL runway, with a 3500ft. crosswind strip, and the best app/dep controllers in the world @ BDL. Any questions? G |
|
#115
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message ... On Nov 27, 9:47 pm, "Maxwell" wrote: "Matt W. Barrow" wrote in ... "Bob Noel" wrote in message ... In article , "F. Baum" wrote: On Nov 27, 8:43 am, "Robert M. Gary" wrote: Many of us have a great successful career without every being a member of a union. In fact, most Americans are not union members. In fact, the top paying jobs in the U.S. are non-union. So I think your point is countered. Robert, you rascal ! I love your simplistic answers. Lets take a look at things that didnt exist before organized labor; Child labor laws, healt care benifits, 40 Hour work weeks, severance, paid vacation, benifits packages, retirement, DC plans,overtime and the list goes on................ If you had a great career with any of these benies you can thank organized labor ![]() FB You are assuming that these "benies" exist because of organized labor. Question: what laws would continue to exist if unions went away and what laws would go away? And which would have evolved naturally with increased productivity and increased expertise in management (that had been going on for a couple hundred years). That's out of Baum's mental grasp, unfortunately. -- Funny thing is, you are all right. Everything mentioned here both pro and con has contributed to the wages paid in this country today for most every job. Child labor laws, health care benefits, 40 Hour work weeks, severance, paid vacation, benefits packages, retirement, overtime pay, minimum wage, etc, etc. It's all had a balancing effect on the wages we all draw every day. Without unions we would all be working for less, no matter what our profession. None of my people are under a collective bargaining agreement. There are business reasons to provide compensation packages that are attractive to gain and retain employees. There are business reasons to maintain productivity. However, there is not one person here would believes his job would be subsidized if we no longer had customers. If anyones (including my) position no longer makes business sense it will be elimiated. That's what makes an economy efficient and maximizes return to investors. If you don't like it you should work for the gov't. I believe and agree with you Robert, 100%. I do feel unions have been quite useful to all of us for "raising the bar" globally across the US of the past 75 or whatever years. But I also believe many of them have had a very negative impact as well, and should take responsibility for many jobs leaving the country. Over the years I have work as a member of both good and bad unions, and in good and bad non union environments. While I can fully appreciate their value, I have also seen situations where they were nothing but a parasite to not only the companies they control, but their membership as well. I also worked some 17 years in a non union environment, where without warning I was singled out and terminated just two years short of my first retirement step, effectively cutting the guts out of my retirement package, with nothing but awards and letters of recommendations in my personal file. So the door really does swing both ways. |
|
#116
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Nov 27, 9:58 pm, "Matt W. Barrow"
wrote: That's out of Baum's mental grasp, unfortunately. MXMatt !!! speaking of mental grasp, how are things at the funny farm ? ![]() -- Matt Barrow Performance Homes, LLC. Cheyenne, WY- Hide quoted text - |
|
#117
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message ... On Nov 27, 9:47 pm, "Maxwell" wrote: "Matt W. Barrow" wrote in ... Question: what laws would continue to exist if unions went away and what laws would go away? And which would have evolved naturally with increased productivity and increased expertise in management (that had been going on for a couple hundred years). That's out of Baum's mental grasp, unfortunately. -- Funny thing is, you are all right. Everything mentioned here both pro and con has contributed to the wages paid in this country today for most every job. Child labor laws, health care benefits, 40 Hour work weeks, severance, paid vacation, benefits packages, retirement, overtime pay, minimum wage, etc, etc. It's all had a balancing effect on the wages we all draw every day. Without unions we would all be working for less, no matter what our profession. Without unions we'd all be working for more. Wages are, like any other economic good, based on supply and demand. What unions do is shift the wages from one industry to another. In that case, somethign has to give. The only thing that can raise wages in improved productivity and union have been instrumental in trashing productivity. In the long run, unions have probably done more to depress wages and ruin their industries. As such I haven't an ounce of sympathy for them and their thug cohorts. None of my people are under a collective bargaining agreement. There are business reasons to provide compensation packages that are attractive to gain and retain employees. There are business reasons to maintain productivity. However, there is not one person here would believes his job would be subsidized if we no longer had customers. If anyones (including my) position no longer makes business sense it will be elimiated. That's what makes an economy efficient and maximizes return to investors. If you don't like it you should work for the gov't. Interestingly, American based branches like Honda and Toyota do not allow unions and their employees are at the top in terms of production and compensation and their futures look bright compared to GM, Ford and Chrysler who are at death's door. -- Matt Barrow Performance Homes, LLC. Cheyenne, WY |
|
#118
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message ... Without a doubt there are some people 'on the street' who can be trained as pilots, but the prudent move would be to choose candidates from an enriched population. Of course it means there are some really potentially good candidates who would therefore not get selected, but the wise manager will do everything she can to choose well. Interviewing a thousand off the street to find a 'keeper' is a lot less efficient than choosing someone from a target rich environment. This is not theory, but real life stuff. Actually, it's gibberish. |
|
#119
|
|||
|
|||
|
"B A R R Y" wrote in message ... On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:42:55 -0700, "Matt W. Barrow" wrote: What is it that you like about it? Lots! IN no particular order... The beach, on the Atlantic Ocean, including the 4WD drivable portion on Cape Cod Tibetan food Falafel Awesome pizza on every street corner Broadway & Times Square The New York Rangers, playing in MSG. Radio City Music and Carnegie Hall Italian food near the real Old North Church Killer Museums, EVERYWHERE! Fenway Park Yankee Stadium The bicycling, on and off-road Vermont and New Hampshire, especially Tuckerman's Ravine on Mt. Washington Block Island, Nantucket, Martha's Vineyard, and Provincetown Whale Watching Kayaking the hundreds of lakes and rivers Lincoln Center Killer fine woodworking resources Antiques, including entire homes and mansions Greenwich Village @ 2 AM The Pattagunks and NY's Southern Tier The Adirondacks Direct to most anywhere in Europe, Asia, or North America, from JFK Newport Tall Ships Boston Pops on July 4th Tanglewood all summer 90F summer and 0F winter days No earthquakes, tornadoes, volcanos, and weak hurricanes. The Yale Art Gallery's non-public furniture collection Toad's Place CBGB (RIP!) Bike New York Our neighborhoods don't look like the rest of the country, no "pool sized" back yards and concrete block walls A "big" development has 25-35 homes. G I'm tired of typing... A $45/mo. tie down at a non-towered field with a nicely maintained, 5000x100 ft., 250 MSL runway, with a 3500ft. crosswind strip, and the best app/dep controllers in the world @ BDL. Other than specifics like Yankee Stadium, Fenway, Greenwich and whale watching, we have most all that, (or better, such as the Rockies vs the Adirondacks) here in Wyoming. Of course, you can go to the Cheyenne public pools and see 300 lb gals in spandex as a substitute for whale watching . -- Matt Barrow Performance Homes, LLC. Cheyenne, WY |
|
#120
|
|||
|
|||
|
Matt, you may not understand labor laws very well. The US branches of
Honda et al can work at keeping unions out, but they cannot by dictate keep them out. And if you choose to interview street picks instead of an enriched pool of potential employees, you must be doing something else very right because your HR folks are wasting time and resources.. On Nov 28, 10:23 pm, "Matt W. Barrow" wrote: "Robert M. Gary" wrote in ... On Nov 27, 9:47 pm, "Maxwell" wrote: "Matt W. Barrow" wrote in ... Question: what laws would continue to exist if unions went away and what laws would go away? And which would have evolved naturally with increased productivity and increased expertise in management (that had been going on for a couple hundred years). That's out of Baum's mental grasp, unfortunately. -- Funny thing is, you are all right. Everything mentioned here both pro and con has contributed to the wages paid in this country today for most every job. Child labor laws, health care benefits, 40 Hour work weeks, severance, paid vacation, benefits packages, retirement, overtime pay, minimum wage, etc, etc. It's all had a balancing effect on the wages we all draw every day. Without unions we would all be working for less, no matter what our profession. Without unions we'd all be working for more. Wages are, like any other economic good, based on supply and demand. What unions do is shift the wages from one industry to another. In that case, somethign has to give. The only thing that can raise wages in improved productivity and union have been instrumental in trashing productivity. In the long run, unions have probably done more to depress wages and ruin their industries. As such I haven't an ounce of sympathy for them and their thug cohorts. None of my people are under a collective bargaining agreement. There are business reasons to provide compensation packages that are attractive to gain and retain employees. There are business reasons to maintain productivity. However, there is not one person here would believes his job would be subsidized if we no longer had customers. If anyones (including my) position no longer makes business sense it will be elimiated. That's what makes an economy efficient and maximizes return to investors. If you don't like it you should work for the gov't. Interestingly, American based branches like Honda and Toyota do not allow unions and their employees are at the top in terms of production and compensation and their futures look bright compared to GM, Ford and Chrysler who are at death's door. -- Matt Barrow Performance Homes, LLC. Cheyenne, WY- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| fighter pilot hours? | Cub Driver | Military Aviation | 26 | September 15th 05 03:39 AM |
| Minimum Experience and VLJ's (was Eclipse 500) | john smith | Piloting | 18 | July 11th 05 08:13 AM |
| 61.57 Recent flight experience: Pilot in command | Julian Scarfe | Piloting | 11 | February 5th 04 03:06 PM |
| Pilot, possibly intoxicated, flies around Philly for 3 hours | David Gunter | Piloting | 62 | January 22nd 04 11:17 PM |
| 1000 hours in PW5 by Oz Pilot | Charles Yeates | Soaring | 3 | December 9th 03 05:39 AM |