![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dude,
The plane I'm looking at is a 2001 172R with the IFR nav package. It has about 1200 hours on it and the price seems very reasonable. Local owner wants to keep it in town. I like the fact it's somewhat new, low time, new avionics etc and has a decent fuel burn rate. My goal is to build time and experience. Finish off more ratings etc. I know I can buy something much cheaper but I'm very hesitant being burnt on the maintenance side with an older airplane and any other lurking surprises it may bring. I know the history of this 172 from the day it came to our local airport from the factory. No damage history etc. Always hangered etc. Is 2001 still too new? Is there lots of room for depreciation still? The price is about 20% less than any other advertised price I have seen for other R models in the same year and hour range. "Dude" wrote in message ... RD, One thing you did not tell us is what you plan to do AFTER 2 years and 500 hours. If you do not plan to trade up, then do not buy new. Bonus depreciation is a great deal, but if it gets recaptured, it ain't so great. Trading up can avoid recapture. If you do plan to trade up, maybe you should rent a little longer, until you feel you are ready for your "target plane" A172 vs. an arrow is not the same, did you mean archer? Are you really just building hours, or trying to get somewhere? If you are trying to get somewhere, you will be flying in IMC. You will want something safe and efficient. An Arrow may keep you happy for 500 hours, a 172 maybe not. If you are seriously traveling, I would get something nicer,likely something faster. Definitely more fuel efficient. Definitely get up to date avionics, and an AP. With that much time in the plane, the workload savings is definitely worth the bucks. The only glass cockpit I like is the Garmin, due to its ability to reset. If these things live up to the press, Garmin will greatly increase its market share. If you are not set in your scanhabits, you might want to get a glass cockpit. If you really are going to put 500 hours on and then sell, I would lean away from brand new. That kind of hours will depreciate a new plane pretty well. You can sometimes pick up nearly new planes at a steal. Just don't buy a lemon like Art's. If you are buying new, and plan to put those hours on, go glass. the more you tell the group, the more we can likely help you narrow down the choices. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | June 1st 04 09:27 AM |
| renting plane out to flight school - profitable? | David Megginson | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | October 13th 03 03:36 AM |
| Conspiracy Theorists (amusing) | Grantland | Military Aviation | 1 | October 2nd 03 01:17 AM |
| BUYING PLANE !! | jure | Aerobatics | 0 | September 13th 03 02:07 PM |
| A Good Story | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 15 | September 3rd 03 04:00 PM |