A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Buying a plane versus renting



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #22  
Old March 1st 04, 09:52 PM
RD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dude,

The plane I'm looking at is a 2001 172R with the IFR nav package. It has
about 1200 hours on it and the price seems very reasonable. Local owner
wants to keep it in town. I like the fact it's somewhat new, low time, new
avionics etc and has a decent fuel burn rate.

My goal is to build time and experience. Finish off more ratings etc. I know
I can buy something much cheaper but I'm very hesitant being burnt on the
maintenance side with an older airplane and any other lurking surprises it
may bring. I know the history of this 172 from the day it came to our local
airport from the factory. No damage history etc. Always hangered etc.

Is 2001 still too new? Is there lots of room for depreciation still? The
price is about 20% less than any other advertised price I have seen for
other R models in the same year and hour range.




"Dude" wrote in message
...
RD,

One thing you did not tell us is what you plan to do AFTER 2 years and 500
hours.

If you do not plan to trade up, then do not buy new. Bonus depreciation is

a
great deal, but if it gets recaptured, it ain't so great. Trading up can
avoid recapture.

If you do plan to trade up, maybe you should rent a little longer, until

you
feel you are ready for your "target plane"

A172 vs. an arrow is not the same, did you mean archer?

Are you really just building hours, or trying to get somewhere? If you are
trying to get somewhere, you will be flying in IMC. You will want

something
safe and efficient.

An Arrow may keep you happy for 500 hours, a 172 maybe not. If you are
seriously traveling, I would get something nicer,likely something faster.
Definitely more fuel efficient.

Definitely get up to date avionics, and an AP. With that much time in the
plane, the workload savings is definitely worth the bucks.

The only glass cockpit I like is the Garmin, due to its ability to reset.
If these things live up to the press, Garmin will greatly increase its
market share. If you are not set in your scanhabits, you might want to

get
a glass cockpit.

If you really are going to put 500 hours on and then sell, I would lean

away
from brand new. That kind of hours will depreciate a new plane pretty

well.
You can sometimes pick up nearly new planes at a steal. Just don't buy a
lemon like Art's. If you are buying new, and plan to put those hours on,

go
glass.

the more you tell the group, the more we can likely help you narrow down

the
choices.







 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 June 1st 04 09:27 AM
renting plane out to flight school - profitable? David Megginson Aviation Marketplace 1 October 13th 03 03:36 AM
Conspiracy Theorists (amusing) Grantland Military Aviation 1 October 2nd 03 01:17 AM
BUYING PLANE !! jure Aerobatics 0 September 13th 03 02:07 PM
A Good Story Badwater Bill Home Built 15 September 3rd 03 04:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.