![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 19:22:25 +0000, G.R. Patterson III wrote:
Greg Copeland wrote: I recently read an article where the author recommended paying for an annual versus a pre-buy inspection. That way, new parts and serviced items are on the old seller and not the new owner. Which, as you found, often seem to pop up when it's time for the annual on your new plane. This certainly seemed like sound advice? Anyone care to make a counter point? You will find it very hard to get the old owner to agree to those terms. It is quite possible to get an owner to agree to having the inspection be done by your mechanic as an annual. The usual terms are that glitches found are discussed after the annual and the existing owner is free to walk away if you try to leverage the price down too much. In that case, your IA may not get to see the logs until after you purchase the plane, and the new parts and serviced items are still probably on you. As toecutter pointed out the last time this sort of thing was discussed, the IA will have to make a written record of the glitches, but few owners would hand the actual logs over under those terms. Another poster stated that his tactic is to allow the mechanic to inspect the logs before inspecting the plane, while the owner keeps the logs during the aircraft inspection. When I sold my Cessna, I held the logs and the IA did not touch them until after the deal was done. In my case, the owner wanted the inspection to be an annual just because he wanted a full year before doing it again. It only cost him about $100 more than getting a pre-purchase done. George Patterson Okay. Fair points. So, assuming that the seller will allow it, does it appear to be the preferred route? Granted, while the seller could walk, it seems like it still bought you protection. Especially so, if the seller isn't willing to price accordingly. Even if the annual is put on the logs until post-sale, sure seems like the preferred path? Ya, I know I'm being pedantic here, but I'm am looking for any downside to this strategy. Thus far, it all seems like nothing but goodness. Greg Copeland |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 11:46 PM |
| Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 10:45 PM |
| For Keith Willshaw... | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 253 | July 6th 04 06:18 AM |
| bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 05:26 PM |
| Stryker/C-130 Pics | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 186 | October 8th 03 10:18 AM |