![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
The flight school where I rent from has all late-model Cessnas, and there
is no doubt that they do not drain evenly. I've heard several "urban-legend" style explanations for the uneven drainage issue, and I don't claim to know which one is accurate. However, they don't generally seem to drain unevenly enough to have any significant impact on weight and balance... Now I actually did all my PPL training in a low-wing Tampico that did not have a "both" option. And a year or so later, when I started flying Cessnas, I saw the "both" selector as a major convenience, and I took advantage of it. But a while ago, I flew in a friend's Bonanza, a low- winger, and we were talking about fuel management. And he reminded me of an EXCELLENT reason to switch tanks during flight even if there is a Both selector. I think someone on this thread mentioned briefly... Basically, let's say your flying West, into a headwind. It's a little stronger than expected, and so you're all ****ed off, and gunning the engine up a bit to try to make up some of the ground speed. Maybe you're at a different altitude than planned, and for whatever reason you're not leaned out as well as you could be. Based on your "optimum" calculations, you think you have 5 hours of fuel. But between the headwind, and not flying optimally as planned, you use 10% more fuel than expected, and you are going to use 10% more time than expected... Bottom line, you now need a fuel stop, but you don't know it... If your fuel selector is on Both, you get one shot. Your right tank may run dry first, but you won't have any idea until your completely dry in both tanks. You get to glide to the nearest golf course and call for help. If you are switching tanks every 1/2 hour, and your right tank runs dry, it's like an alarm. Your engine fails, and you do your ABC checklist, switch tanks, and get your power back. You can take a moment to calm down, figure out what happened, and find the nearest airport with services and fuel up. You get a "second chance". Of course, it's not guaranteed - you might only have a drop of fuel in the other tank. But flying on both guarantees you to be a glider on empty... Ever since that conversation, I fly "low-wing" style once airborne, and switch tanks to both on taxi, takeoff, and landing only... Peter R. wrote in : Koopas Ly ) wrote: Is the procedure of only using one tank only applicable to certain C172 year/models? I've flown a variety of 172's from late 60's models to brand new 2002's, and have always used "both" tanks during flight...just wondering... Switching tanks is not in the '02 172 CRUISE checklist, but it is something that I do to maintain an even balance across both tanks. This is because the difference (at least in the '02 172SP I fly) between the two after a long flight can be substantial. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| F-104 in Viet Nam Question | Don Harstad | Military Aviation | 2 | August 28th 04 09:40 AM |
| Night bombers interception in Western Europe in 1944 | Bernardz | Military Aviation | 205 | July 22nd 04 06:31 PM |
| IFR Checkride Checklist | BTIZ | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | April 18th 04 01:06 AM |
| Long-range Spitfires and daylight Bomber Command raids (was: #1 Jet of World War II) | The Revolution Will Not Be Televised | Military Aviation | 20 | August 27th 03 10:14 AM |
| Tanks for nothing (repost from Bearhawk list) | Del Rawlins | Home Built | 0 | August 6th 03 04:06 AM |