![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dan Truesdell" wrote in message This is GE's UDF (for UnDucted Fan) project. Theory was that the high efficiency blades would add up to better fuel consumption. The program was never brought to market. The image you posted is one of the flying testbeds (possible the only, although I think there might have been a 727 used first). I never heard about a 727 UDF -- possible, but #2 engine would be a tough one. I talked to a few folks involved after the project died - I think around 89 or 90. They said it actually showed a lot of promise, good efficiency over the jet for short range. But the word was that the marketing results killed it. It just looked scary. Given a choice, focus groups always shied away from "prop planes". They were considered old. I used to run into that in commuter lines, too. People would get off a 20 year old Boeing, and board a brand new t-prop and crack jokes about the props. A mind is a marvelous thing, wasted. JG |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 10,500 feet is way the heck up there! | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 97 | October 22nd 03 05:22 AM |
| six engines - what the heck was that? | Norm Soley | General Aviation | 4 | September 12th 03 02:41 PM |