![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
My mistake: I failed to mention that this was a "no backup" scenario.
My intent was to illustrate the relative dangers of using a new technology in varying applications, and to touch on the failure rates of mature vs. new technology. Sorry for my poor communications... "Peter Gottlieb" wrote in message t... Unless you're completely immersed in IMC, even a "total failure" of a glass cockpit should be more of an inconvenience than a safety issue. And if you're talking about those IMC conditions, then you already have some complex systems in use that you rely on which could just as easily fail as the glass versions. "Bill Denton" wrote in message ... Assume you are in an automobile, boat, or locomotive with a glass cockpit, and you have a total failure of the glass cockpit. You close the throttle and/or apply the brakes and come to a stop. No big deal. But if you are in an aircraft and have a total glass cockpit failure you have a major problem. Contrary to your statement, there is something "better" about steam gauges: a history. With steam gauges we have a history, we know about when they will fail and what the failure points will probably be. But with a glass cockpit, the only failure information we have is computer-projected, we don't really know much about what their in-service failure history will be. Prudence would dictate not only that you back up an unproved system, but that you back it up with a proved system. Five years or so down the road, when we have some realistic, real-world failure data, you will probably see pilots becoming more receptive to glass cockpits. But until more service data is built up, a healthy dose of caution is in order... "Thomas Borchert" wrote in message ... Dennis, You should go work for the NTSB, since you're clairvoyant an accident causes. Once all the magic smoke leaks out of those electronic chip thingies, life is a bitch... Once something fails, the regulation-mandated back-up kicks in. It doesn't matter whether that's vacuum, a second battery or whatever else. There's nothing inherently "better" about steam gauges - except they satisfy reluctance in the face of progress. We'd still be living on trees if everybody had that mindset. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| North Korea Denounces US Stealth Bomber Deployment | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | July 2nd 04 10:20 PM |
| Cirrus SR22 Purchase advice needed. | Dennis | Owning | 170 | May 19th 04 05:44 PM |
| Cirrus Airframe Life Limits | Dave | Owning | 16 | April 27th 04 06:58 PM |
| C-130 Unit Completes Two Year Deployment | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 30th 03 11:04 PM |
| Airmen gear up for another 120-day deployment | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 24th 03 01:04 AM |