![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bela P. Havasreti wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 07:58:32 -0700, "C J Campbell" wrote: off, you don't lose your nose gear!) At the same time, losing all that weight might improve your glide significantly. No, less weight does not significantly improve glide performance, it just shifts your best glide to a lower speed range. (It will improve your glide downwind though, and make it worse into wind) More important however would be the aerodynamic shape of whatever was left of the nose after having prop, engine and part of the cowling fall off. It is not too bold a bet to say the aerodynamic characteristics will have been clearly worse after the damage than before, thus more drag and worse glide. CV |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 03:26 PM |
| Who's At Fault in UAV/Part91 MAC? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 72 | May 1st 04 12:28 AM |
| 12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 13th 03 12:01 AM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 04:17 PM |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 02:27 PM |