![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
"John Harlow" wrote: What a shame. I never, ever fly without at least trying to get traffic advisories, and it's very rare I don't get it. As a student, because NONE of my instructors ever did, I didn't think to much about it (they are the pros, don't you know?). Now, I consider anyone who is to lazy to get flight following as someone too foolish to fly with. The shame is thinking radar services will save you. Two weeks ago, while getting traffic advisories from approach, I was climbing to altitude. I had relaxed a little since I was above 3500' (the real kill zone here is 2000 and below) and was enjoying the scenery. I looked low on the left side to find that my 206 now appeared to be a biplane since there was a wing sticking out on the left below me. It took a nanosecond to realize what I was looking at...we were same direction and the other airplane was within 10 feet of me. I broke hard up and right expecting to feel/hear a collision. Once clear I rolled back and check to find the other traffic continuing as if nothing had happened. I was talking to approach, I have a permanently assigned code, the other aircraft was a Katana so I'm sure he is Mode C equipped as well. Approach never said a thing. I fly skydivers. We have a letter of agreement with Approach that assigns our airplanes specific transponder codes. The usual call is I'll give them a call at 2000' or so and report on and altitude climbing to. The service I get depends greatly on the controller. Some simply acknowledge radar contact and that's the last I hear until I give the 1 minute warning for jumpers away. Others call traffic as if I am the only airplane they are working....one guy even reports the jumpers once they open...didn't realize approach radar was that good. Twice last weekend before I had reported on the frequency the controller came on and said "81Z you on?", I replied and he called closing traffic for me...one of which would have been a little close for comfort (this particular controller is one of two that are friggin' awesome!!). Point is, the service you get depends greatly on the individual controller. I've flown all over the country into small airports as well as Class B areas. I usually use radar services if able, but certainly don't depend on them and in some cases find it easier to do without. -- Dale L. Falk There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing around with airplanes. http://home.gci.net/~sncdfalk/flying.html |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 03:26 PM |
| Who's At Fault in UAV/Part91 MAC? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 72 | May 1st 04 12:28 AM |
| 12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 13th 03 12:01 AM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 04:17 PM |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 02:27 PM |