A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Clearance with an Odd Intersection



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #27  
Old March 10th 05, 01:24 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 9 Mar 2005 21:25:1 -0500, "Ash Wyllie" wrote:

What is needed is something like a readback that means "do I have the new
clearance correct" followed by "give me a chance to see if I can accept it".
It seems that currently that a readback means you have accepted the new
clearance. Which is a problem.



Where is it written that "a readbck means you have accepted the new
clearance"?

Quite the contrary. The excerpt below is from the AIM.

Notice that the pilot's responsibility to "accept or refuse" the
clearance issued comes AFTER the readback instructions.

Also note that the readmack is described only as " a means of mutual
verification".

This idea of a "readback as acceptance" is just one more item of
aviabaloney.



b. ATC Clearance/Instruction Readback. Pilots of airborne aircraft
should read back those parts of ATC clearances and instructions
containing altitude assignments or vectors as a means of mutual
verification. The readback of the "numbers" serves as a double check
between pilots and controllers and reduces the kinds of communications
errors that occur when a number is either "misheard" or is incorrect.

1. Include the aircraft identification in all readbacks and
acknowledgments. This aids controllers in determining that the correct
aircraft received the clearance or instruction. The requirement to
include aircraft identification in all readbacks and acknowledgements
becomes more important as frequency congestion increases and when
aircraft with similar call signs are on the same frequency.

EXAMPLE-
"Climbing to Flight Level three three zero, United Twelve" or
"November Five Charlie Tango, roger, cleared to land."

2. Read back altitudes, altitude restrictions, and vectors in
the same sequence as they are given in the clearance or instruction.

3. Altitudes contained in charted procedures, such as DPs,
instrument approaches, etc., should not be read back unless they are
specifically stated by the controller.

c. It is the responsibility of the pilot to accept or refuse the
clearance issued.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
No SID in clearance, fly it anyway? Roy Smith Instrument Flight Rules 195 November 28th 05 11:06 PM
Clearance: Direct to airport with /U Judah Instrument Flight Rules 8 February 27th 04 07:02 PM
Q about lost comms on weird clearance Paul Tomblin Instrument Flight Rules 34 February 2nd 04 10:11 PM
Alternate Intersection Name in Brackets? Marco Leon Instrument Flight Rules 7 January 22nd 04 05:55 AM
Picking up a Clearance Airborne Brad Z Instrument Flight Rules 30 August 29th 03 02:31 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.