A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

No Medical Required



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6  
Old April 14th 05, 02:39 PM
Dude
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Brett,

I will accept your apology, as I am sure many others here will as well.

Here is the trick with your engine. Let's say everyone agrees that it seems
to have not suffered badly from storage. Still, the plane is likely to be
sold a few more times before it gets to TBO. And, each time, extra
diligence will be needed (just like you and your AP so wisely did).

That sort of thing reduces value of the plane even if it passes every time.
There are buyers unwilling to do the diligence. It's just the way it is.
You may sell it for a good price, and so may the next guy, but someone is
going to have a hard time selling it at some point.

If I were you, I would lessen concerns by pointing out that you will
discount the plane for the price of a top overhaul, or for a few hundred
hours that it may come up short in the end. That way, the new buyer gets
the upside if it keeps on ticking, and has already saved the downside up
front.


wrote in message
ps.com...
First, my apologies -- I forgot there was a rec.aviation.marketplace
for such things. (At least I'm not selling Viagra or stock tips!) The
plane only flew 100 hours in twenty years, that's why the top. The
engine runs great, uses less than a quart between changes, and has
absolutely zero metal in the screen. I have flown it 175 hours since I
bought it. When my A&P IA did the first annual he did the compression
check three times, tried another tester on the plane and then tested a
different plane with both testers--to make sure the results were
accurate--78s and a 79! He said they were the highest numbers he'd
seen on a Continental. I think the key is that it is flown regularly,
and leaned in flight and for taxi. (MA3 carb with mixture control.)

This is the 5th plane I've owned. All have always scored well on the
compression tests during annuals, including two other Continentals. I
try to never let a plane sit more than four days without flying it--the
more the better, (for me and for the plane).

- Brett



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CFI without commercial? Jay Honeck Piloting 75 December 8th 10 04:17 PM
ramifications of new TSA rules on all non-US and US citizen pilots paul k. sanchez Piloting 19 September 27th 04 11:49 PM
Question Medical Captain Wubba Piloting 5 June 11th 04 05:12 AM
Question on medical and kidney stones nospam Piloting 13 November 8th 03 07:10 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.