![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... No, I meant give the takeoff clearance a little sooner while the aircraft that just landed is still going down the runway heading for the taxiway. This would have the same advantage as P&H in most circumstances. That has the disadvantage of not ensuring runway separation. Yes, that works also, but then what is the point of P&H if not to get more throughput per active runway? The point of position and hold IS to get more throughput per active runway, and it does. Withholding the landing clearance while an aircraft is in position wouldn't change that. Right now, aircraft can be cleared to land while a departing aircraft is in position on the runway. Obviously, some action has to be taken before the arriving aircraft can land safely, the controller expects to issue a takeoff clearance to the aircraft in position before the arriving aircraft gets too close. But what if he doesn't for some reason? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 12:35 PM |
| Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 06:14 AM |
| Position and Hold at uncontrolled field | dave | Piloting | 42 | February 26th 04 02:25 AM |
| Hold "as published"? | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 83 | November 13th 03 04:19 PM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 04:17 PM |