|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#10
November 18th 03, 06:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
"Newps" wrote in message
news:WMrub.236755$Tr4.696922@attbi_s03... Bob Gardner wrote: When you are cleared for the VOR-A you are expected to fly the profile....fly at the MDA and not a foot lower to the missed approach point or until you see the runway environment as defined in 91.175. When you see the airport, you should real quick ask for a contact approach...then you can follow ground reference and altitude is not a factor. Ah, bull****. He had the runway in sight, descended and landed. What's the problem? It depends on the missing information in the phrase: I descend 166 feet and am able to remain just under the cloud deck John, if this had actually happened, could you see the runway all the time during that descent? -- David Brooks 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question to the IFR Pilots Out There | Cecil E. Chapman | Instrument Flight Rules | 90 | November 21st 03 04:47 PM |
| DME req'd on ILS (not ILS-DME) approach? | Don Faulkner | Instrument Flight Rules | 13 | October 7th 03 04:54 AM |
| Which of these approaches is loggable? | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | August 16th 03 06:22 PM |
| Terminology of New WAAS, VNAV, LPV approach types | Tarver Engineering | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | August 5th 03 04:50 AM |
| IR checkride story! | Guy Elden Jr. | Instrument Flight Rules | 16 | August 1st 03 10:03 PM |
Threaded Mode