![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... 1. You cannot roll your own visual approach. You must have a clearance and the weather conditions must permit it, as per the guidance in the AIM. 2. What you did is more like a contact approach, which is different from a visual approach, both, the distinctions of which are well documented and should be part of your instrument pilot knowledge base. 3. Eventually, such early departures from the IAP not only violate 91.175, they can eventually result in clipping a hilltop, tree, or tower. Nothing in his statement suggests he departed from the IAP. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question to the IFR Pilots Out There | Cecil E. Chapman | Instrument Flight Rules | 90 | November 21st 03 03:47 PM |
DME req'd on ILS (not ILS-DME) approach? | Don Faulkner | Instrument Flight Rules | 13 | October 7th 03 03:54 AM |
Which of these approaches is loggable? | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | August 16th 03 05:22 PM |
Terminology of New WAAS, VNAV, LPV approach types | Tarver Engineering | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | August 5th 03 03:50 AM |
IR checkride story! | Guy Elden Jr. | Instrument Flight Rules | 16 | August 1st 03 09:03 PM |