![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Harry K wrote: wrote: He misses the ME-109 because the recoil of firing the bullet accelerates the B-17 just a bit, so that the bullet, travelling at a little less than the bomber's speed actually briefly follows the bomber as it falls. A related question: Haven't there been cases of supersonic fighters shooting themselves down when they caught up to the shells they'd fired forward? Dan I was hoping someone would answer that. I recall seeing/hearing/reading somewhat the same thing back when. Best I can recall it involved an F-86 or equivalent (not supersonic) and happened by firing and then going into a dive thus flying into the bullet stream. Are 50 cal bullets supersonic? If so, the plane would also have to be. I don't know the muzzle velocity of 50 caliber ammo but even it is supersonic, it is balistic whereas the plane is powered so it could (maybe) dive and catch the bullets as they slowed. -- FF |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Good morning or good evening depending upon your location. I want to ask you the most important question of your life. Your joy or sorrow for all eternity depends upon your answer. The question is: Are you saved? It is not a question of how good | Excelsior | Home Built | 0 | April 22nd 05 01:11 AM |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Accurate plane performace? | R | Simulators | 27 | December 19th 03 04:54 AM |