![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
How is it that having a chute could have a causal connection to accidentally
flying the airplane into a mountain? Or blowing the altitude on an instrument approach? Or any other CFIT scenario? Also I challenge your statement that the "CFIT rates are so high" for Cirrus. I have heard that there are only a 1000 Cirrus's flying so far, so I can't see how there would be any reasonable conclusion that could be made yet due to too few data points. "Colin Kingsbury" wrote in message nk.net... Not to pick on Dan personally but the "If I get into trouble I'll pull the lever" thing has just got to be part of the reason why Cirrus CFIT rates are so high. Yeah it's great to have the option when your engine quits over the mountains at night or a wing snaps off, but there are plenty of ways to kill yourself that the 'chute won't do anything to prevent. -cwk. "Dan Thompson" wrote in message gy.com... The nice thing about a Cirrus is also you could always (i.e., once) pop the chute if the TKS couldn't keep up. I would think this would be comforting when choosing to fly through a what was believed to be little known ice that the TKS system should be able to easily handle, just in case you found it is was more ice than anyone would have expected and you ran out of other options. I think the TKS/chute combo would allow a lot of flights that would keep me on the ground otherwise. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|