![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Stefan wrote:
Matt Whiting wrote: Yes, many people do, but pilots aren't normal people. :-) Pilots are generally thinking people by nature and I suspect much less likely to buy based on emotion or perception. And that's why they absolutely refuse to buy a new design but prefer to deliberately stick with 50s technology... :-P The Cirrus design is also 50s, actually even earlier. Low-wing, conventional tail airplane design is rather old. They used a newer material, but even composites have been around now for probably 50 years. Don't confuse new with better. I'm glad Cirrus exists as I think it will possibly spur Cessna to build a new airplane that will have the advantages of a Cessna with improved performance. That will benefit us all, well at least us high-wing fans who like an airplane that can be repaired almost anywhere in this country and most of the world. Matt |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1/72 Cessna 300, 400 series scale models | Ale | Owning | 3 | October 22nd 13 04:40 PM |
| Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 03:37 AM |
| Wow - heard on the air... (long) | Nathan Young | Piloting | 68 | July 25th 05 07:51 PM |
| Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 06:14 AM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 04:17 PM |