![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ice blonde wrote:
It can be fun getting the gauges on some airplanes to read anywhere near accurately. Even replacing gauges or senders or both will often not get them any more accurate. Why? Aircraft fuel tanks tend to be fairly short, compared to auto tanks. They also tend to be wider and longer than a comparably-sized fuel tank in a car. It's not economical to manufacture special sending units for aircraft, however, so outfits like Cessna and Piper use units made for cars. An old-fashioned sending unit is basically a rheostat with a steel wire attached to it and a float attached to the other end of the wire. Usually they are set up so that current is sent to the gauge and the sending unit is attached to the ground ("earth" in GB) wire. When the float is at the top, the gauge is fully grounded and it reads full -- float at the bottom, no current flows and the gauge reads empty. There are several problems with this, at least two of which are caused by the use of automotive components. First, there's no requirement for accuracy in auto gauges, and, in fact, the manufacturers deliberately make the systems so that they still read 1/2 tank when the tanks are actually 3/8 full (this supposedly gives the impression of better fuel economy). Second, a sending unit that's designed to have the float travel over a range of perhaps 12" in an auto tank does not perform as precisely when the wire is shortened and the float travels over only 7". You also may have had occasion to drive autos in which the gauges read higher or lower if you are going uphill? This is caused by the sending unit being located towards the front or rear of the tank. The same sort of thing occurs to a lesser extent in some aircraft. Lastly, aircraft tend to bounce around more than autos. Gasoline also tends to slosh back and forth more in the flatter tanks. This tends to bounce the floats of the sending units, making the gauges more erratic than autos. George Patterson Drink is the curse of the land. It makes you quarrel with your neighbor. It makes you shoot at your landlord. And it makes you miss him. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Time, running out of fuel and fuel gauges | Dylan Smith | Piloting | 29 | February 3rd 08 08:04 PM |
| Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 03:24 PM |
| Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 12:35 PM |
| Cherokee Fuel Gauge | Mike Spera | Owning | 6 | July 15th 05 06:30 AM |
| Is Your Airplane Susceptible To Mis Fu eling? A Simple Test For Fuel Contamination. | Nathan Young | Piloting | 4 | June 14th 04 07:13 PM |